Skip to content
MVIE Pro
Fed context

FOMC statement of August 8, 2006

This statement of the Federal Open Market Committee, compared sentence by sentence with the scheduled statement before it: what changed in the text, and how the Committee voted.

In short

The Federal Open Market Committee released this statement on August 8, 2006. Compared with the previous scheduled statement of June 29, 2006: 4 sentences changed, 2 were added, 5 were removed, and 1 stayed the same. In words: 66 added, 132 removed. The vote on this statement: 1 member voted against: Jeffrey M. Lacker. On the June 29, 2006 statement: Unanimous.

FOMC statement · August 8, 2006

Changed sentences against the previous scheduled statement (June 29, 2006)

1 unchanged · 4 changed · 2 added · 5 removed · words +66 / −132

June 29, 2006
Unanimous.
August 8, 2006
1 member voted against: Jeffrey M. Lacker.
Changed

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to raise keep its target for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to at 5-1/4 percent.

Changed

Recent indicators suggest that Economic growth is moderating has moderated from its quite strong pace earlier this year, partly reflecting a gradual cooling of the housing market and the lagged effects of increases in interest rates and energy prices.

Removed

Readings on core inflation have been elevated in recent months.

Removed

Ongoing productivity gains have held down the rise in unit labor costs, and inflation expectations remain contained.

Changed

However Readings on core inflation have been elevated in recent months, and the high levels of resource utilization and of the prices of energy and other commodities have the potential to sustain inflation pressures.

Added

However, inflation pressures seem likely to moderate over time, reflecting contained inflation expectations and the cumulative effects of monetary policy actions and other factors restraining aggregate demand.

Changed

Although the moderation in the growth of aggregate demand should help to limit inflation pressures over time Nonetheless, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain.

Removed

In any event, the Committee will respond to changes in economic prospects as needed to support the attainment of its objectives.

Removed

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 25-basis-point increase in the discount rate to 6-1/4 percent.

Removed

In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Dallas.

Added

Voting against was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who preferred an increase of 25 basis points in the federal funds rate target at this meeting.

Show the unchanged sentence
Unchanged

The extent and timing of any additional firming that may be needed to address these risks will depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as implied by incoming information.

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System — the statement on federalreserve.gov · June 29, 2006

How to read this page

The page sets this statement of the Federal Open Market Committee next to the scheduled statement before it, sentence by sentence. The Fed’s sentences are shown as published, in English.

In a changed sentence, the words that were dropped are struck through and the new words are underlined. A sentence found only in the newer statement is marked as added; one found only in the older statement, as removed. Sentences that did not change are collapsed.

The counts say how many sentences fall into each of those groups, and how many words were added and removed. They count edits; they do not weigh them.

The vote lines show how the Committee voted on each statement and who voted against, as the statement itself reports it.

The comparison is made by a fixed rule, not by a model, and it reads nothing into the text.

The Fed’s text is shown in its original English and is not translated. This page only shows what changed in the text; it is not a reading of direction, tone or risk, and it is not part of the MVIE score. MVIE Pro is independent research and is not affiliated with the Federal Reserve.