Comunicado del FOMC del 21 de septiembre de 2016
Este comunicado del Federal Open Market Committee, comparado frase por frase con el comunicado programado anterior: qué cambió en el texto y cómo votó el Comité.
En pocas palabras
El Federal Open Market Committee publicó este comunicado el 21 de septiembre de 2016. Frente al comunicado programado anterior, del 27 de julio de 2016: 5 frases cambiaron, 2 se añadieron, 2 se eliminaron y 14 se mantuvieron iguales. En palabras: 88 añadidas, 45 eliminadas. La votación de este comunicado: 3 miembros votaron en contra: Esther L. George, Loretta J. Mester, Eric Rosengren. La del comunicado del 27 de julio de 2016: 1 miembro votó en contra: Esther L. George.
Comunicado del FOMC · 21 de septiembre de 2016
Frases cambiadas frente al comunicado programado anterior (27 de julio de 2016)
14 sin cambios · 5 cambiadas · 2 añadidas · 2 eliminadas · palabras +88 / −45
- 27 de julio de 2016
- 1 miembro votó en contra: Esther L. George.
- 21 de septiembre de 2016
- 3 miembros votaron en contra: Esther L. George, Loretta J. Mester, Eric Rosengren.
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June July indicates that the labor market strengthened has continued to strengthen and that growth of economic activity has been expanding at a moderate rate picked up from the modest pace seen in the first half of this year.
Job gains were strong in June following weak growth in May.
On balance, payrolls and other labor market indicators point to some increase in labor utilization in recent months.
Although the unemployment rate is little changed in recent months, job gains have been solid, on average.
Household spending has been growing strongly but business fixed investment has been remained soft.
The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators conditions will strengthen somewhat further.
Near-term risks to the economic outlook have diminished appear roughly balanced.
The Committee judges that the case for an increase in the federal funds rate has strengthened but decided, for the time being, to wait for further evidence of continued progress toward its objectives.
Voting against the action was were: Esther L. George, who Loretta J. Mester, and Eric Rosengren, each of whom preferred at this meeting to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 1/2 to 3/4 percent.
Mostrar las 14 frases sin cambios
Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting earlier declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports.
Market-based measures of inflation compensation remain low; most survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability.
Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of past declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further.
The Committee continues to closely monitor inflation indicators and global economic and financial developments.
Against this backdrop, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent.
The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.
In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation.
This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.
In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal.
The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run.
However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.
The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal funds rate is well under way.
This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.
Fuente: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System — el comunicado en federalreserve.gov · 27 de julio de 2016
Cómo leer esta página
La página pone este comunicado del Federal Open Market Committee junto al programado anterior, frase por frase. Las frases de la Fed se muestran tal como se publicaron, en inglés.
En una frase cambiada, las palabras que salieron aparecen tachadas y las nuevas, subrayadas. Una frase que solo está en el comunicado posterior se marca como añadida; una que solo está en el anterior, como eliminada. Las frases sin cambios aparecen plegadas.
Las cifras dicen cuántas frases caen en cada uno de esos grupos y cuántas palabras se añadieron y se eliminaron. Cuentan cambios; no los ponderan.
Las líneas de votación muestran cómo votó el Comité cada comunicado y quién votó en contra, tal como lo indica el propio comunicado.
La comparación sigue una regla fija, no un modelo, y no interpreta el texto.
El texto de la Fed se muestra en su inglés original y no se traduce. Esta página solo muestra qué cambió en el texto; no es una lectura de dirección, tono ni riesgo, y no forma parte de la puntuación MVIE. MVIE Pro es investigación independiente y no está vinculado a la Reserva Federal.